| Home » Discussion Area » Rant/Rave » What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders?
 | 
| What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? [message #6910] | Tue, 02 March 2010 18:00  |  | 
|  wishing34 Messages: 216
 Registered: March 2009
 | Senior Member |  |  |  | Hi 
 This continues a discussion (Rant-Rave/Lakeland Revival???) elswhere on the
 board but since it goes into a new direction I put it as a new topic.
 -------------------
 
 With this:(in a previous post)
 
 | Quote: |  | 
 In these modern times of abundant medical imagery any ministry that
 says they have had lots of signs/wonders will be able to produce many
 before/after medical proofs.
 
 
 | 
 
 I meant when the real anointed ministry comes along there will
 automatically be medical confirmations available because medical
 imagery is so common now days.
 
 ==============================
 But you really got me thinking with your post.
 
 In the end times we expect mucho signs/wonders - from the real
 anointing of God's ministers and from the devil trying if it were
 possible to decieve the elect.
 
 So if mucho signs/wonders are coming. . .
 What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders?
 
 This is not an easy topic.
 I came up with quite a few ideas
 and look forward to hearing more.
 
 
 
 Here are some ideas as to precautions w/r signs/wonders:
 
 --------------------------------------
 
 1 - Fake technology
 
 Sage mentioned photoshop - anyone could print up fake medical documents
 to try to prove healings. - solution is to check out the original sources
 -interview the doctors, see the original X-rays. Obviously no one has time
 nor medical training to do this - it would be a great web site idea and a
 service to the church if some believers with medical training would analyze
 healing claims and give reports.
 
 ---- holograms could imitate real looking, solid apparitions
 of Jesus or angels or other. ( maybe Rev 13?? )
 
 ---- Radio waves can put a voice into the inner ear and a person will actually
 "hear" a voice in their head - They should do this to Osama Bin Ladin and say
 "OSAMA !! STOP BLOWING THINGS UP" - he might think it was the voice of his god.
 
 --------------------------------------
 
 2 - Sincere self deception
 
 All that is thought to be supernatural is not.
 
 ----A totally sincere sister in the '80s , in the faith walk, felt her fingernail
 on her tooth and found a hole near the gum. She confessed faith for healing of
 a cavity. She began to actually feel tooth pain (was power of suggestion). She eventually
 felt solid tooth in the hole and had a glorious testimony.
 
 Years later she realized that it was not a cavity but was receding gums which had
 slowly uncovered a normal edge to the tooth enamel that had mimicked a hole
 in the tooth - until the gum receded far enough to reveal solid tooth beneath.
 There had been no cavity, no healing - just a misunderstanding - very sincere though.
 
 At modern day revival meetings people feel a warmth in their head and believe a
 brain tumor is now dissolved. - very sincere
 
 At meetings people , because of emotions (endorphins), feel less pain and
 testify that their arthritis is cured.
 
 --------------------------------------
 
 3 Diseases go into remission, placebo effect
 
 ---even terrible diseases go away in the natural about 2?? percent of the time.
 
 False ministers with a lot of meetings will eventually have a natural remission
 occur which they will claim was validation for their ministry.
 
 The placebo effect is a real phenomena. I heard an advertisement that said
 their pills helped 30 percent of the people compared to 20 percent helped by placebo.
 I thought wow - one out of five people felt better just from the placebo effect.
 
 --------------------------------------
 
 4 Too low threshold
 
 Christians have an incredibly low threshhold to accept a miracle - if it is from
 our people. But if it from strangers then we exercise normal skepticism.
 
 In the recent revival meeting someone found a diamond in their Bible and all
 believe it was created out of nothing by God and put there. - instead of put
 there by a person.
 
 Back in the day HEF used to say how impressed a friend was driving in fog
 while the Freemans rebuked the fog as they drove on. The fog would come and
 go as they drove and prayed - just like patchy fog always appears to do.
 Now HEF was "our guy" so that was miraculous?? Would it get our respect if
 a some random Methodist minister made that same claim?
 
 ***************************
 If an alleged sign/wonder can have a possible human/science explanation
 then it is not a sign/wonder.
 ***************************
 
 The definition of sign/wonder means it makes a person wonder how it could
 be possible and points them to the God of the Christian who experienced
 the sign/wonder.
 
 ---------------------------------------
 
 5 - Don't believe what ministers claim to have happened - especially in remote
 backwoods areas - Africa
 
 In this current "revival" fantastic claims are made about what happened in
 Africa in the past by this same minister. I will not believe the claims until
 the same great signs happen with video/medical proof that can be analyzed by
 experts via the web.
 
 ---------------------------------------
 
 6- Outright fraud is possible
 
 There was a case decades ago where a minister would call out diseases around
 the room with incredible accuracy. Then people would verify the accuracy of
 that "word of knowledge" and go forward and receive prayer.
 Turns out the minister's wife would talk to people in the lobby before the
 meeting and gather information. Then she was in a booth with a radio telling
 the false minister the info via a radio in his earpiece - "The lady in a red
 dress is from Chicago and fell 2 years ago and her hip hurts."  He would
 fool the people as if his info came from God but it came from his wife.
 
 When legs grow out it is possible to hold the person's heels with legs
 outstretched in front of them, their hips "locked" against the back of their
 chair . . .  if you rotate their feet in an arch while their hips remain
 not moving then the relative length of each leg appears to change or grow.
 A clever con man could really make this look good.
 
 ---------------------------------------
 
 7 - Falling down is not a sign
 
 People fall down a lot in revival meetings by the power of suggestion. Once
 it becomes the norm then people expect it and when they feel a little light
 headed in the moment they go on down - sincere but power of suggestion.
 
 Watch and see if ministers are pushing on people.
 
 ---------------------------------------
 
 Of course as Sage says - regarding a ministry . . .
 must glorify Christ
 must be right on essential doctrine - Godhead, etc
 must have Christian character (money grubbers???)
 follow up Christian walk will be according the Bible
 
 
 ===============
 ===============
 ===============
 
 
 Any further ideas appreciated - shoot down what I said or add thereto
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |  |  | 
Goto Forum:
|  | What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Tue, 02 March 2010 19:03 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Tue, 02 March 2010 21:06 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Tue, 02 March 2010 23:46 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: JWBTI  on Wed, 03 March 2010 01:29 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: sparkles  on Wed, 03 March 2010 03:38 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: JWBTI  on Fri, 05 March 2010 02:01 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Fri, 05 March 2010 15:31 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: JWBTI  on Fri, 05 March 2010 21:56 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Sat, 06 March 2010 03:20 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Sun, 07 March 2010 22:03 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: JWBTI  on Mon, 08 March 2010 01:31 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Mon, 08 March 2010 02:03 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: Mark L  on Mon, 08 March 2010 02:24 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: grandom  on Mon, 08 March 2010 02:52 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Mon, 08 March 2010 03:00 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Mon, 08 March 2010 04:58 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: Mark L  on Mon, 08 March 2010 13:18 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Tue, 09 March 2010 16:35 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Tue, 09 March 2010 17:38 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Tue, 09 March 2010 19:10 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Tue, 09 March 2010 20:23 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Tue, 09 March 2010 22:51 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Wed, 10 March 2010 14:53 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: william  on Tue, 16 March 2010 00:00 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Fri, 05 March 2010 17:55 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Fri, 05 March 2010 23:59 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: sparkles  on Sat, 06 March 2010 04:40 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: JWBTI  on Sat, 06 March 2010 03:08 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: Mark L  on Sat, 06 March 2010 20:47 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: james  on Sat, 06 March 2010 21:35 |  
|  | Re: What is the criteria to judge valid signs/wonders? By: sparkles  on Sat, 06 March 2010 23:23 |  
 
 Current Time: Sat Oct 25 15:45:42 UTC 2025 
 Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00828 seconds |