In watching "Into the Universe With Hawking," I find it interesting that he stated, "I not only wanted to know how the universe began, but why."

I love science. I also love it when God baffles man! I think that is where it gets hysterical. lol

There comes a point when you just have to jump off of the cliff and believe. His creation is just too big! Just imagine, we will be learning neat stuff for eternity!

His Word is so complex that a child can understand it. That may sound strange, but it is true. That is where the jumping off of the cliff, like sheep, comes in. It is also so simple, that humans go in circles trying to figure out The Ancient of Days.

My advice....KISS...Keep it simple stupid. Whoops bad confession, but you know what I am getting at.


Our God is mighty to behold!......

[Updated on: Wed, 10 August 2011 01:52]

[Updated on: Fri, 12 August 2011 03:16]

Very good info, Hardbones, and interesting.

In the article on the link you shared it said, "Meanwhile, belief in extraterrestrial intelligences continues to grow with an almost religious fervor.

Ok, just finished watching all of the Hawkings presentations and explanations. He stated, “In the Big Bang, hydrogen, carbon, iron, 02, and gravity were created, etc., blah, blah, blah due to "luck!" "Stars, simply by accident, are created." Can you believe that a Cambridge scientist, who held the same job as Isaac Newton, said the word luck and accident when referring to a scientific explanation? That is NOT science. It becomes philosophy due to no actual proof. In other words, just like my Microbiology book, it deems itself presumptuous and rediculous.

Hydrogen, and all of the other elements used to create this "Big Bang" had to have a starting point. Gravity is a force. If the “Big Bang” was “lucky” which was stated on the show, from where did these two things originate? It gets to the point of saying, which was first, the chicken or the egg?

When he said, "It was magical" he absolutely lost me and I gagged. Most of you know why I would have that reaction.

I mean, seriously, using the term magical to explain a scientific theory of the beginning of the universe is seen as solid evidence by the blind sheep of this earth? Sad.

It is not science, but philosophical to me. This was also stated, "The Big Bang began as being "inside" of the cosmos." OK...am I missing something here or do I see that when you have an inside, an outside must exist, or an opposite?

Going back to my Microbiology class experience, which is already posted, this statement is as bad as the rest. My Microbiology book used twelve words related to uncertainty in two paragraphs when explaining the “Big Bang” or endosymbiosis.

I have to laugh. It is interesting and entertaining. I guess I am one of the stupid ones who just simply believe. In any case, I really don’t think I look as stupid as these ridiculous explanations that man is desperately trying to create, no pun intended.

I confess that I have the stupidity of a sheep and follow Him wherever He leads me and whatever He explains to me in His Word.

[Updated on: Wed, 10 August 2011 08:39]